News

Unions escalate “generational” fight as BHP port strike looms

Written by Allen Newton | Jul 8, 2026 3:21:49 AM

WESTERN Australia’s mining sector is bracing for its most significant industrial action in decades, with three unions locking in an eight‑hour strike at BHP’s Port Hedland operations next Thursday.

The stoppage follows months of stalled negotiations and marks a watershed moment in the push to re‑establish union strength across Pilbara iron ore sites.

The Electrical Trades Union, Australian Manufacturing Workers Union and Australian Workers Union have confirmed coordinated protected action after eleventh‑hour talks with BHP failed to produce progress.

Hundreds of port workers are expected to walk off the job in the first major Pilbara mine‑related stoppage in more than 30 years .

Electrical Trades Union WA secretary Adam Woodage said the strike was a last resort after months of frustration.

“This is nobody’s preferred way forward, but when it is our only way forward, we will take it,” he said.

Mr Woodage, quoted on the ABC and WAtoday said he hoped the stoppage would “sharpen the minds” of BHP management and shareholders, urging the company to negotiate a fair port agreement.

The ETU has described the dispute as “generational”, arguing BHP has used “US‑style stonewalling tactics” rather than engaging in standard enterprise bargaining seen elsewhere in WA’s resources sector.

The union says BHP’s approach has left workers without transparent progression, enforceable conditions or parity with agreements covering similar workforces at other operators.

Australian Manufacturing Workers Union WA state secretary Steve McCartney said members had shown patience throughout seven months of bargaining but had reached the end of the line.

Mr McCartney was quoted by WAtoday and the ABC as saying workers were seeking fair wages, transparent career pathways and enforceable conditions, and accused BHP of dragging out negotiations despite record profits.

“Workers shouldn’t have to wait seven months for genuine progress at the bargaining table,” he said. “Members have had enough. They are demanding to be heard and they are demanding a fair agreement.”

Mr McCartney said the dispute could end immediately if BHP returned to negotiations “in good faith”.

The Australian Workers Union has taken a similarly firm line. Acting WA secretary Craig Beveridge said workers wanted an agreement that removed arbitrary decision‑making and guaranteed fair treatment.

In comments published by Daily Cargo News, Mr Beveridge said:

“They want BHP to stop whingeing and start taking their concerns seriously.

“Workers want an agreement that provides transparency, fair treatment and guaranteed conditions — not having their livelihood at the whim of individual managers.”

The AWU is part of the combined ports unions group coordinating action across Port Hedland.

The unions’ pay claim has not been publicly detailed, but they are seeking significantly more than the 16% over four years BHP recently secured with 1814 workers at its main iron ore mining hub.

A full shutdown of Port Hedland — Australia’s largest iron ore export gateway — would cost BHP more than $120 million a day in lost revenue and deprive WA of $6.85 million in royalties for each day exports halt.

High‑voltage ETU members began protected action in March, escalating from overtime bans to stoppages across BHP’s Pilbara mines. The unions say further and more frequent stoppages will follow if negotiations remain stalled.

BHP has not issued a public statement on the latest escalation.